“With a democratic president, republicans are all for criticizing, but God forbid you criticize Bush.” - Philosophy professor.
Um, I’m sorry, but republicans basically didn’t give a shit with all the “criticisms” the left was saying about Bush. I see more leftists bash republicans for criticizing Obama than the other way around during Bush.
Blood Bath 2 SUCKED!! First one was much better!
Hopefully Blood Bath 3 will be much better.
(Source: joecatholic)
O yeah, it was the Republicans fault. Despite the fact that Obama had a FULL DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS in 2009 and 2010. It was all the Republicans fault who took control of the House in 2011. With a full Democratic Congress, Obama could have gotten anything he wanted passed. Republicans were the minority. From 09-11, Dems had 58 in the Senate and 257 in the House.
ALL of tumblr over 18, who are in other countries outside the US, tries to become US Citizens for november 6th, and then we send around 3 million tumblr users each to alabama, to texas, Tennessee, Kentucky, north and south dakota, and arkansas, Oh and georgia for insurance..and then you vote…
Yeah, let’s not have an honest election, let’s bring in people from other countries, illegally make them legal citizens, and commit mass voter fraud, because you’re afraid of change, and the betterment of this country.
I was discussing with someone how I thought, since the last time we had a Republican president we entered two wars, Romney would probably try to top it. I proceeded to imagine him on top of a war horse. And since I’m also convinced he has a Napoleon complex, well here you are. I am unapologetic.
And yet, we are now in Libya and Yemen now, and Obama plans to keep troops in Afghanistan and Iraq. Not to mention the drone strikes all over the middle east now.
Common sense is.
New York City is a gun-free zone for law abiding citizens, yet there was a shooting this morning. What does that tell you?
It’s because the libs and dems, and those who support gun control, and restricting gun ownership, do not realize, that laws do not stop a criminal from committing a crime. A gun free zone for law abiding citizens means nothing to a criminal, they’re not law abiding, they’re not going to look at the sign that says “No Guns” and go “Aww schucks, looks like I can’t shoot up NYC today”. Thomas Jefferson realized this more than 200 years ago, and we are struggling to understand this simple concept today. The only people who are affected by gun control laws, are those who respect the law, and never hope to fire a gun on another human person.
“Laws that forbid the carrying of arms … disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes … Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.”
—Thomas Jefferson, quoting Cesare Beccaria in On Crimes and Punishment (1764)
(Source: i-just-go)
Are you freaking kidding me?
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/calif-8th-grader-pulled-out-of-class-for-having-photo-of-military-brother-on-her-binder/
freaking commifornia… Darn Modern Liberals are screwing up everything over there. A kid can’t even have a picture of her brother who is in the service.
Damn it California it’s crap like this that makes me hate you, and why I will never move to your state.
Im a student going to school to become a teacher, and this kind of stuff makes me sick even more of our education system. This is just screwed up. All the photos are appropriate for school, theyre not intrusive, and theyre expression (something our school system seems to like to suppress). I dont see the harm in her having a picture of her softball team, her brother in the service, or anything else that makes her happy in her binder. Hell, when I was in middle school, girls had pictures of themselves, and friends and activities in their binders, and lockers, no one got in trouble.
(via slide-to-the-right)
